On November 19, 2015, the Vermont Supreme Court decided in favor of VTel Wireless, Inc. and upheld the Public Service Board’s approval of a telecommunications tower in Bennington, Vermont. This decision marks only the second Section 248a decision by Vermont’s highest court, both of which were decided in favor of DRM’s clients. The case centered on whether the Board properly denied neighboring landowners’ motion to intervene and request for a hearing on account of the Project’s aesthetic impacts. In affirming the decision below, the Court emphasized the thoroughness of VTel’s evidence before the Board. The Court also stressed that the neighbors received considerable detail about the Project in VTel’s prefiling notice and had ample notice of the requisite showing to secure a hearing. The Court concluded that the record fully supported the Board’s findings and that it acted well within its discretion in approving the Project without holding hearing. In light of this conclusion, the Court did not need to reach the Board’s ruling on intervention.
Client Resources VT Supreme Court Upholds PSB Approval of Bennington Tower
DRM • December 8, 2015
- Share this post on LinkedIn
- Share this post on Twitter
- Copied to clipboard!
Client Resources
Related Articles
View AllNovember 22nd, 2024
Texas Federal Court Sets Aside DOL’s New Salary Threshold for Exempt Workers
By: Krista A. Gay
On Friday, November 15, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“District Court”) issued a decision invalidating the April 2024 Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule which increased the minimum salary threshold for executive, administrative or professional (“EAP”) employees to be exempt from the Federal Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) overtime requirements.
Read More arrow_forward
November 21st, 2024
The NLRB Rules Captive Audience Meetings are Unlawful
By: Krista A. Gay
On November 13, 2024, in its decision Amazon.com Services LLC, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) banned mandatory “captive audience […]
Read More arrow_forward
November 18th, 2024
Corporate Transparency Act – Federal Reporting Requirements for Homeowners Associations
By: Alexis L. Peters
The CTA requires certain entities to submit beneficial ownership reports, which may include HOAs.
Read More arrow_forward
October 21st, 2024
What Connelly v. United States Means for Closely-Held Businesses
Effective now, the Corporate Transparency Act requires certain entities to report beneficial ownership information to the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) through an online filing.
Read More arrow_forward